Rental law in the Netherlands: What is legally valid?
Questioner
In 1989 I received a rental contract from MOGbeheer, the house was taken over in 20016 by Vinken Vastgoed and another contract, which contract is then legally valid, because the second contract contains several things that I was previously reimbursed for and now not.Lawyer
With the signing of the second contract, the first one has expired. The second contract is therefore applicable.Questioner
In 1989, as the first resident, I concluded an agreement for the maintenance obligations for the tenant and landlord with MOG Beheer bv. Now Vinken Vastgoed has it under management in 2016 with other maintenance obligations, I have only received it, which is then legally validLawyer
If you have not signed the new contract, the terms of the old contract are still in effect. Vinken Vastgoed has taken over the management and with it all obligations that MOG Beheer has towards you based on the old contract.Questioner
In 1989, as the first resident, I concluded an agreement for the maintenance obligations for the tenant and landlord with MOG Beheer bv. Now Vinken Vastgoed has it under management in 2016 with other maintenance obligations, I have only received it, which is then legally validLawyer
See my previous answer. If you have more specific questions, it is best to contact me directly.Questioner
In 1989, as the first resident, I concluded an agreement for the maintenance obligations for the tenant and landlord with MOG Beheer bv. Now Vinken Vastgoed has it under management in 2016 with other maintenance obligations, I have only received it, which is then legally valid thanks for your feedbackNeem de volgende stap
Blijf niet rondlopen met vragen over je situatie. Stel je vraag en krijg persoonlijk antwoord van een ervaren jurist.
Privacy is gewaarborgd.
